SpicyTricks

Thailand is the last Asean country to be reviewed as the council
winds down the first four-year cycle of its Universal Periodical Review
(UPR) session which will be completed in the next two months. The UN's
191 other members are set to discuss Thai human rights on Oct 5.


The report on Thailand - posted on the website of the Office of the
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) - is divided into three
parts. It includes a 20-page national report prepared by the Thai
government, an 11-page UNHCHR report and an 11-page report put together
by the council based on submissions from 27 stakeholders including
Thailand's National Human Rights Commission, as well as Thai and foreign
NGOs.



Reports to be presented, including those written by the government,
are non-partisan compilations. The UPR is, therefore, a constructive
peer review as all UN members' human rights situations will be discussed
by other colleagues, he said.


He said he hoped the government would be prepared to take advice and
make some meaningful pledges in certain areas, such as revoking the
emergency decree and other legal reforms.


Although discussions will be taking place under the helm of a new
government, it is required to show some good-faith gestures aimed at
improving human rights in the country, he said.


The Thai public should be ready to engage in the process to set a
good example for other nations, said speakers at the seminar, which was
organised by the People's Empowerment Foundation.


The UNHCHR report mentioned discrimination, especially among women and girls, and different races and religion.


Torture and extrajudicial killings remain prevalent while special
laws have worsened the problem of impunity for certain people, the UN
report said.


The government in its report said that it would improve the public
welfare system to reduce socio-economic disparities and improve people's
well-being. But this requires systemic and structural reform on
political, economic and social fronts.


The report also focussed more on the southern insurgency than the political conflict with the red shirt movement.


The national report simply said the recent political conflict, which
could lead to violence, needs to be addressed based on the principles of
democracy, rule of law and reconciliation so that all groups feel that
they are being fairly treated.


The national report said the government had provided remedies to
people affected by the protests and the subsequent crackdown last year.


The three reports also referred to the independent fact-finding
Commission for Reconciliation (TRC) and the NHRC that are still
investigating last year's violence.


Strikingly, though, the national report fails to discuss the
controversial application of certain laws, such as Article 112, which
covers lese majeste offences. The NGO report devoted only a little more
to the subject, a paragraph on freedom of expression and the plight of
human rights defenders in Thailand.


Kwanravee Wangudom, of the People's Information Centre of the
April-May 2010 Incidents, said the TRC and the NHRC had made only a
feeble attempt to enhance reconciliation.


Only restoration of justice and adequate remedies for the victims of
last year's crackdown could heal the country's wounds, said Ms
Kwanravee, who also called for the basic right to bail for all red shirt
detainees.


Chaiyan Rachagool, of Payap University, said the government report was self-serving and useless.


David Streckfuss, an article 112 critic, has suggested that the UPR
discuss recommendations made by the Enlightened Jurists Group from
Thammasat University to consider problems in the use of the lese majeste
law.